Industry — UNIDO CIP
Competitive Industrial Performance. South Africa leads the continent, followed by Morocco, Egypt, Tunisia, Botswana and Eswatini. Côte d’Ivoire and Senegal each rose 11 places between 2015 and 2020.
Continental benchmark
The best industrial index is not the best PIPRA target. We read every African market through two lenses — competitiveness, and real suitability for the model — and sequence expansion in waves.
AI illustrationSequencing of the expansion waves
An indicative sequence crossing competitiveness and suitability with execution realities: legal and linguistic proximity, political access, size. The real determinant is high-level political access and a champion ministry — as in Cameroon.
Côte d’Ivoire, Senegal. Legal (OHADA / UEMOA) and linguistic proximity with Cameroon; strong recent industrial growth; GS1 and standardisation present; rapid replication of the software.
Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria. Large, high-pain, high-digital-adoption markets; ECOWAS and EAC beachheads. Ghana and Kenya offer the best maturity-to-execution ratio; Nigeria the greatest scale potential.
Tanzania, Rwanda, Uganda. Rwanda: excellent business climate and public support for digital — an ideal pilot ground. Tanzania and Uganda: volume and EAC integration.
Morocco, Egypt, Tunisia. The most mature industrial markets: PIPRA value is reoriented towards export, high-end compliance and regional value chains rather than basic formalisation.
Mauritius: headquarters and financial base of the holding, not a Trade Pass market. South Africa: a mature market with a distinct value proposition — partnerships and skills rather than standard deployment.
Dual-lens reading
The champions of the industrial index — South Africa, Morocco, Egypt, Tunisia — are economies already highly structured, where traceability, standardisation and formal financing are relatively advanced. The pain PIPRA treats is, paradoxically, less acute there.
Conversely, markets with an intermediate industrial index but high pain and size — Nigeria, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Kenya, Tanzania — meet the conditions where the model unfolds its full value. Nigeria is the continent’s fourth-largest GDP but only 24th on the infrastructure index, with a massive informal sector and SME financing gap: not a small opportunity, but the magnitude of the need the Trade Pass and Trade Pass Finance can fill.
AI illustrationFive dimensions of competitiveness
Five international indices, each with its own reference year and African coverage. Tier rankings are an indicative synthesis derived from sourced rankings.
Competitive Industrial Performance. South Africa leads the continent, followed by Morocco, Egypt, Tunisia, Botswana and Eswatini. Côte d’Ivoire and Senegal each rose 11 places between 2015 and 2020.
139 economies, 78 indicators. Mauritius 53rd worldwide, ahead of South Africa (61st), Seychelles (75th), Botswana (87th) and Senegal (89th); Morocco its best ever (57th). Biggest rises: Namibia +11, Morocco +9, South Africa +8, Nigeria +8, Tunisia +5.
Seychelles dominates, followed by Egypt, Libya, Mauritius, Tunisia, Morocco (≈ 70) and Algeria (≈ 62). Economic size does not guarantee infrastructure quality: Nigeria is 24th (≈ 26).
Replaces Doing Business. First edition covers 50 economies (expanding to ~180 by 2026) on three pillars. Rwanda is the best sub-Saharan performer (82.09 in international trade), ahead of Mauritius, Ghana and Tanzania. African coverage is still partial.
Mauritius leads Africa (58th worldwide), ahead of South Africa (69th) and Kenya (77th). Central to PIPRA: the model rests on mobile scanning, mobile money and connectivity.
Continental dashboard
●●● High · ●● Medium · ● Emerging · ○ Partial coverage. Cameroon is the reference market — the calibration basis of the doctrine — not an expansion target.
| Market | Block | Industry | Innovation | Infrastructure | Business | Digital |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Africa | Southern | ●●● | ●●● | ●● | ○ | ●●● |
| Morocco | North | ●●● | ●●● | ●●● | ○ | ●● |
| Egypt | North | ●●● | ●● | ●●● | ○ | ●● |
| Tunisia | North | ●●● | ●●● | ●●● | ○ | ●● |
| Mauritius | Southern | ●● | ●●● | ●●● | ●●● | ●●● |
| Botswana | Southern | ●●● | ●● | ●● | ○ | ●● |
| Eswatini | Southern | ●●● | ● | ●● | ○ | ● |
| Namibia | Southern | ●● | ●● | ●● | ○ | ●● |
| Algeria | North | ●● | ● | ●●● | ○ | ● |
| Nigeria | West | ●● | ●● | ● | ○ | ●● |
| Côte d’Ivoire | West | ●● | ●● | ●● | ○ | ●● |
| Ghana | West | ●● | ●● | ●● | ●● | ●● |
| Senegal | West | ●● | ●● | ●● | ○ | ●● |
| Kenya | East | ●● | ●● | ●● | ○ | ●●● |
| Rwanda | East | ● | ●● | ● | ●●● | ●● |
| Tanzania | East | ●● | ● | ● | ●● | ● |
| Ethiopia | East | ●● | ● | ● | ○ | ● |
| Uganda | East | ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● |
| Zambia | Southern | ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● |
| Cameroon (reference) | Central | ●● | ● | ● | ○ | ●● |
External benchmark Indicative synthesis of UNIDO CIP (~2020), WIPO GII 2025, AfDB AIDI 2024, World Bank B-READY 2024 and NRI 2025.
The PIPRA suitability grid
A market can be “average” on competitiveness and “high” on PIPRA suitability — the most sought-after profile for high-impact replication.
Volume of SMEs and informal actors to formalise; size of the internal market. Strong signal: Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, DR Congo, Tanzania, Kenya.
Intensity of the need for traceability and anti-counterfeiting in health, agro and consumer goods. Strong signal: Nigeria, DR Congo, most markets with high informal trade.
Severity of the credit constraint: guarantees, information asymmetry. Almost general; acute in West and Central Africa.
Mobile money and internet penetration; scan and payment base. Strong signal: Kenya, Ghana, Tanzania, South Africa, Senegal, Côte d’Ivoire.
Possibility of a champion ministry; a GS1 organisation and a standards agency. Strong signal: Côte d’Ivoire, Senegal, Rwanda, Ghana, Kenya.
Ability to serve as a bridgehead to a regional community. Nigeria (ECOWAS), Kenya (EAC), Côte d’Ivoire / Senegal (UEMOA), Egypt / Morocco (North).
Accelerating legal factors
Regional legal harmonisation is a structural advantage. The OHADA area — uniform business law across 17 states, mostly French-speaking — and the WAEMU greatly reduce the cost and risk of setting up an affiliate from one country to another. Cameroon is itself an OHADA member, so contractual, corporate and security frameworks are largely transposable to Côte d’Ivoire and Senegal.
Combined with Mauritius as a traditional gateway to French- and English-speaking Africa, the holding can articulate a Francophone legal engine (OHADA / UEMOA) for speed and an Anglophone market engine (ECOWAS / EAC) for scale.
AI illustrationGo deeper
Priority engagement
Investors, governments, development institutions and future affiliates: tell us who you are and how you would like to engage. Your enquiry is routed to the right team at PIPRA Africa Holdings.